Lumpkin Plumbing Essay

Lumpkin experienced a steady annex in gross gross sales since it began 1990 and has recently expanded inventories to accommodate a relatively larger sales emergence. Richard Lumpkin borrowed $150,000 to expand the warehouse to hold more inventories and include a flummox to attract retail sales. The expansion will benefit the company as long as inventories are managed well and the increase in labor does non harm profit margins. Lumpkin Plumbing projected figures for the balance sheet, income statement, and notes flows for 2000.Lumpkin anticipated harvest-festival for the 2000 year but underestimated the increase in native assets and liabilities by 47. 37%. Lumpkin also projected a 20% increase in sales and realized an actual increase of 63. 15%. though the company underestimated the sales increase, it was able to manage costs and increase authorise income 63. 42%. If Lumpkin can maintain its profit margin and take benefit of increased demand then the expansion would be ben eficial to the health of the company.Lumpkin is managing the expansion and should be able to make its lend reelectments of $50,000 per year. Lumpkin also underestimated the maturation of its inventories and accounts collectible. Inventories at Lumpkin increased 89. 39% though the increase was projected at 10. 48%. Lumpkin had $628,800 in inventories at the end of 2000 which raises concern for the liquidity of the company. Accounts payable projections were also off, with a projected decrease of $2,000 and an actual increase of $216,400.The increase in accounts payable is partly due to the extension of A/P days from 10. 40 to 45. 10 from 1999 to 2000. The extreme A/P could be from inventory costs and also account for the large increase in inventory holdings. Lumpkin could be planning for an increase in sales growth and hold inventories to meet the demand. Even if the discrepancies between the projected and actual figures for the inventories and A/P are explained by increases in s ales, these should have been accounted for in the projections and should not have been so dramatically different.Lumpkin Plumbing effectively used the loan to grow the company and is in fair financial health to repay the loans. Though the company has met the increased demand and managed operating costs, the difference in some projections raises reasons for concern. If Lumpkin is not able to forecast financial conditions accurately, the financial hereafter of the company is uncertain, increasing its default risk. I recommend Lumpkin Plumbing be considered for future loans after financial statements are analyzed repayment of the flowing loan is complete.